|
CHRISTMAS COMES EARLY TO GLENVIEW
The Glenview Park District will begin marketing its new recreation center
at the Glen October 1, and Commissioner Judy Beck hopes everyone in
Glenview will find a membership in their Christmas stocking.
Year-round access to the indoor water complex, "Splash
Landings," will cost $140 plus $70 for each additional family member.
There's a splash pool for young kids, a giant slide and interactive water
toys for older children. Adults can dive into the six-lane, 25-yard
lap pool, soak in a warm water therapy pool or whirlpool.
A membership in the fitness club includes use of Splash Landings plus
weight machines, aerobic equipment, a track, two gyms for basketball,
volleyball and indoor soccer, meeting rooms and for an extra charge
a variety of classes, child care, and massage therapy provided by
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare. The price tag for Glenview
residents is $375 for one adult, $550 for two and $150 for each
additional family member. Kids under four are free. Non-residents
will pay 25 percent more.
Early bird discounts are being offered through the end of January along
with a reduced rate for folks who will use the facilities during the
middle of the day and a three-month rate for college students who are home
for a limited time. The daily charge for Splash Landings is $5 per
person. The fitness club will charge $10 a day $12 for
non-residents.
The new Park Center, which will open in early January, also boasts
separate wings for early childhood programs, cultural arts and the senior
center. A special exhibit of what's to come is on display at the
Rugen Center.
RUGEN REMAINS IN LIMBO
Meanwhile, the Park Board is debating what to do with Rugen a
facility built in 1943 and expanded over the years. Demolition is
appealing because renovation could cost more than $3 million. But some
board members argue that Glenview needs more gyms. They're
considering saving the core of Rugen its gymnasium, senior game room,
lobby and restrooms while demolishing the rest to make way for additional
sports fields. Staff and consultants are doing research on
that idea and looking for groups that might need the space and share the
costs. The Park Board is expected to decide Rugen's future
this fall.
VILLAGE BOARD TO VOTE ON A TEARDOWN MORATORIUM
The Glenview Plan Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals struggled for
nearly three hours but could not agree on how best to regulate additions
and homes built to replace teardowns. The panel is moving toward
consensus on a system similar to one used in Lake Forest. It's
called Maximum Building Size, and it sets limits on the square footage of
a home relative to its lot, based on outside measurements.
Plan Commission Chairman Tim Doron said agreement might have been reached
if some key members of the team had received faxes sent on Friday
afternoon, outlining details of this approach and suggesting visits to
about 25 different teardown or home addition sites in Glenview.
Commissioners Jack Bevington, Joseph DiMattina and Linda Witt said they
got the materials late or not at all.
After months of reviewing the problem on paper, some who received the
faxes decided to accept the challenge and spent the weekend driving around
Glenview, looking at large new homes and additions. "I met some
interesting people and had some interesting conversations," said
Doron with a chuckle. "It really was an eye opener."
At the Village Board's next meeting, August 1, Trustee Rachel Cook is
expected to follow through on her original motion by proposing a
moratorium on teardowns. Most of the board seems poised to fall in
line even President Nancy Firfer who has completed two "listening
sessions" at neighborhood field houses this month. In both
cases, residents gave her an unhappy earful about teardowns.
Citizens' Action for Proportionality, a local group advocating the new
teardown ordinance, hopes residents will come to the board's meeting at
7:30 p.m. Tuesday to show support. "We want to give the Plan
Commission as much time as they need to put together a strong
ordinance," said CAP member Biff Thiele, "but in the mean time,
the character of our neighborhoods is being compromised by
disproportionately large replacement homes and additions. We need a
temporary moratorium."
JOHNS DRIVE TO OPEN BETWEEN CHESTNUT AND OLD WILLOW
With Lehigh Road closed for construction, north and southbound traffic has
been forced onto already congested Waukegan Road and other arteries.
The village board has voted to open another north/south connection that
could speed the trips of drivers heading to and from Willow Road.
They'll be able to take Johns Road to Old Willow, past Carrot Top, to
Willow and back. The trustees voted to ban big trucks and will
revisit their decision in six months to make sure everyone is happy.
BELMONT VILLAGE SEALS THE DEAL 9 ACRES REMAIN OPEN FOR NOW
On July 26, Texas-based Belmont Village concluded its purchase of six
acres formerly owned by NICOR at the corner of Shermer and Golf.
The firm intends to build an assisted living facility at the site.
Nine adjacent acres are still owned by the utility and are expected to go
back on the market soon. That property, which provides a substantial
buffer between a residential neighborhood and busy Golf Road, is zoned for
industrial use. Without a change in the zoning, experts say NICOR
will not get top dollar for the land. Glenview's park district
has expressed no interest in the property, and while neighbors made a
strong protest against development last fall, no one has come forward with
a viable proposal for preserving the open space.
PERSISTENCE PAYS FOR SWAINWOOD RESIDENTS
Some residents of Swainwood who failed to win village funding for a
10-foot fence to shield them from traffic on Lake Avenue and commercial
development at the Glen decided to keep fighting Village Hall, and
their persistence finally paid off. Their neighbors to the
west were given a 10-foot fence at public expense, but they could only win
support for a 6-foot fence. Village bureaucrats contended they did
not suffer as much as their western neighbors. After organizing a
tour of their yards for some Trustees, the east side crowd returned
to Village Hall on July 18 to demand their fair share of timber and
were rewarded with the promise of a 10-foot fence at an extra cost to the
Village of $11,000.
PRESERVING THE PAST BUILDING OUR FUTURE
Nearly two years after Trustees approved the idea of a Historic
Preservation Board to study buildings of possible significance in our
Village, President Firfer is expected to name her appointments to that
board Tuesday. The good news, we suppose, is that buildings
not torn down since October, 1998 have gotten older and more
historic while Firfer dragged her feet.
One week after the owner of Glen Oak Shopping Center, Jim Smirles,
promised work would begin at the corner of Waukegan and Lake future
home for Trader Joe's there is still no sign of construction
activity.
NO CAR WASH FOR THE GREAT PARK
Despite an impressive sales pitch and the threat of legal action, would-be
developer Mike Duncan left the board meeting with no prospect for building
his beloved car wash near the corner of Lehigh and Chestnut. Duncan
showed impressive architectural drawings of a building in the federal
style looking much like the building Glenview State Bank plans next
door. He promised extensive soundproofing and landscaping to
disguise the nature of the enterprise opposite Gallery Park at the Glen
and argued he needed a business with high-cash volume to pay for
improvements to the Chestnut Street property.
Duncan contends more than $200,000 in landfill and water detention are
necessary because the Village raised Chestnut Road and turned his land
into a "bathtub." He offered to eat the costs of repairing
that damage for the right to build, but the board didn't bite. Now,
Duncan is considering a lawsuit to force Glenview to "fix" his
property.
GOLFERS TO TALK ABOUT PARK DISTRICT PLANS
Park District officials predict their new nine-hole course at the Glen
will be ready for play by August 1, 2001. Meanwhile, officials are
looking for a way to make up for lost revenues from the existing course
off Shermer south of Glenview Road. Glenview once averaged 64,000
rounds of golf per year but is down to 55,000. Long-time users
of the course worry that fees will be raised or season passes eliminated
to raise revenues. The Park District invites duffers to discuss
various options at 7 p.m. August 30 in the Cafι of the Glenview Golf
Club.
SPELLING BEE CHAMP BUZZING ABOUT FLOWERS
Glenbrook South's Hirsh Sandesara, best known for a series of spelling bee
victories during his younger years, is back in the news bringing
flowers to his former elementary school in District 30. As an
Eagle Scout, Sandesara committed to a colorful project elaborate
landscaping of Willowbrook School. He has designed and secured
donations for seven flower beds that will be planted by fellow scouts on
August 5 and 12. Glenview's Park District has provided guidance and
will donate equipment for the giant gardening effort. Hirsch also
persuaded four local pizzerias to provide lunch for his assistants.
Sandesara had hoped to install a prairie garden for educational purposes,
but given the manicured look of a residential neighborhood around the
school, he and his Park District advisor decided to go with more
traditional, ornamental plants. "We thought homeowners might mistake
the prairie plants for a garden of weeds," he explained, "so we
moved the prairie to a spot behind the school."
READERS WRITE ABOUT JOHN PATTON'S PRESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE
Jon Leverenz: "I want to commend Trustee Patton for the extremely
competent and fair manner in which he chaired the June 18, 2000 Village
Board meeting. His leadership skills are head and shoulders above
the other trustees, which he clearly demonstrated that night. I take
strong issue with your statement that he prevented the public from
speaking. The public was only you, Ms. Hausman, and Trustee Patton
was correct that public comment on an agenda item that was continued to
the next Board meeting was premature. It is clear you single him out
for criticism on a whim. If you expect to be a credible source of
information, you should applaud Trustee Patton for the many good things he
has done for our Village including his fostering of open space, and for
his help in creating and preserving the prairie."
The Watch replies: We did commend Trustee Patton for his efficiency,
however, we do not confuse efficiency with good government. The Watch is
also surprised by your suggestion that Trustee Patton helped "create
" the prairie. Without wandering onto theological ground, we
would say God created the prairie, and Patton has done little to preserve
it. Finally, for the record, at least three other people filled out
cards asking to speak on this subject, and as President of the Glenview
Prairie Preservation Project, Hausman speaks for more than 100 active
members and contributors. There is nothing premature about their
wish to protest another delay of the protection promised by Glenview's
Environmentally Significant Areas Ordinance.
Biff Thiele comments: I was impressed with how efficiently Trustee
Patton ran the last board meeting (July 18), but some of his decisions
appeared arbitrary. One agenda item was environmental protection for the
Air Station Prairie, which is of considerable importance to many.
Before the Board meeting, a decision was apparently made to postpone the
discussion. The developer of land near the prairie, Catellus, was
given a courtesy call and told not to come. That courtesy was not extended
to folks from the Glenview Prairie Preservation Project and others who are
eager to reduce future damage to that important piece of land.
While it may have appeared to the cable audience that Sandy Hausman was
the only person there contesting the issue, she was simply the one that
Mr. Patton singled out. Half a dozen people got up and left in
disgust when Mr. Patton announced he was removing the agenda item until
Catellus could be there for the debate. I think I can safely assume
that if Catellus had been there and asked to move ahead, Mr. Patton would
have done so, whether the opposition showed up or not.
There was also discussion of teardowns at that meeting. The
Board had given the Plan Commission a deadline of July 18 to come up with
a new ordinance. If they failed, the Trustees agreed to consider a
moratorium. With total disregard for that June 6 promise, the
Board's President and Village Manager McCarthy excluded the item from the
July 18 agenda. When residents asked why, they were told it
was too late to make changes; the agenda was already done, and the issue
would not come up. And yet, on the very day of the Board meeting, Patton
had no problem removing the prairie discussion from the agenda. Are
there two sets of rules, or do items simply get added and deleted
arbitrarily at the whim of Village officials?
ABOUT STORMWATER IN THE ACRES
BM writes: "I have lived in Glen Oak Acres for 25 years and am very
concerned about the tactics and money being used by the Village to force
this storm sewer issue. What the Village insists are serious
flooding problems, in most cases are actually "ponding"
problems--water that sits for a short period of time and then quickly
dissipates. The consultants' plans will not necessarily preserve the
country charm of Glen Oak Acres nor will they solve the so-called
problems. Plans are to install ditches and swales, with the endangerment
of many old trees and no guarantee that the water will be carried by these
swales. In most places the slope is not great enough to move water."
"The premise that our roads have been degraded by water is ludicrous.
In most cases the roads are 25 years old and older. The last
significant road paving was done in the mid-1970s. Trucks from
numerous construction projects, seemingly ubiquitous garbage trucks,
school buses, landscaping trucks parked on the roadway (in order to
pass them traffic has to go off the road thereby breaking down the
pavement at the edges) all of these factors have led to road
degradation."
"Historically, Glen Oak Acres has had a natural drainage system which
runs from Sunset Ridge to Wagner. Over the years the Village has turned
the other way as residents have filled in their properties and blocked the
natural drainage. The Village has not been diligent about clearing
culverts and keeping under-road culverts in operating condition. There is
a zoning code in Glenview which prohibits homeowners from changing the
grade of their property. This code has rarely been enforced. In fact if
you look at most of the new construction in Glen Oak Acres, these homes
have been built on "mounds" thereby throwing their water at the
existing (now "below grade") homeowners."
"Rather than ruin our area with storm sewers and their attendant
upheaval, a number of alternative measures could attain the same or
possibly better and certainly cheaper results. When the Village selected
the engineering firm for this project, they chose the most invasive
and EXPENSIVE plan."
"The majority of residents in Glen Oak Acres have no drainage problem
or are willing to live with the infrequent ponding' problems. Why
should these people have to bear the cost of a special service area? The
residents of Glen Oak Acres contribute significant tax dollars to the
Village for which we get little in return."
TAKING A SWING AT THE PARK DISTRICT
JC was miffed when the Park District decided to close the Navy's golf
course and upset by the prospect of higher fees to play at Glenview's main
course off Shermer Rd. He writes: "The Glenview Park District
Commissioners are intent on substantially raising fees to turn the golf
course into a larger cash cow than it already is. The Commissioners
assessed Glenview golfers a total of $253,301 in 1999 for
administrative overhead and yet the golf course gets no tax dollars from
the Park District and pays its own way. So when a golfer pays his
real estate tax bill he pays for park district administration and when he
pays his golf green fees he is again paying the park district's
administrative charge. Ask the Commissioners why, and they're likely
to say: "Let's not bring that up again. It's the way we
do it."
"The Park District has recently put out a questionnaire which they
will use as a tool to validate their drive to raise the fees they charge
Glenview golfers. Many of the questions on the questionnaire are
biased and the sample of respondents should be investigated."
A CABLE CRISIS
JR says: "Over the past several years, we have had reception
problems, called TCI and now AT&T: After coming out three times
in a year, the third serviceman told us we needed a new line in the
outdoor box because it was wet and squirrels had gnawed the cables.
We don't know if those cables were replaced, but the reception is still
horrible at times!"
"We have had appointments the past two weeks: They told us they
had to come into our house to check the sets. One day they said
there was no one home, and the last time, they said they "fixed
it," and when we asked how they could do this if they didn't come
inside, they didn't know and made another appointment (which forced us to
waste another day staying at home waiting for this phantom service
person). Today we saw an AT&T man up on the pole, and by the
time we got outside to invite him in to see our snowy pictures, he
vanished. We're becoming angry about this sloppy
service, paying money and not being able to watch tv."
"Does the Village have any kind of hotline to address complaints
regarding cable service problems?"
The Watch replies: Julie Soto is Glenview's point person for cable.
Call her at 724-1700. She can file a formal protest on your behalf.
DRESS FOR SUCCESS IN PUBLIC ADDRESS
Appalled by the attire of residents who speak to the Glenview Village
Board, BH writes: "The men are particularly offensive, showing up
looking like they just stepped out of their gardens with crummy, too
tight shirts stretched over their bellies, wrinkled, baggy shorts and
sandals or scuffed up shoes with no socks. What happened to personal
pride? Look like a slob, and you'll be treated like one."
LEAVING A LEGACY
AB wonders: "How Nancy Firfer and her cronies will be remembered when
they leave office? What kind of legacy will they leave? I bet
they won't live here in Glenview due to the terrible traffic their
development will cause. They will move in an attempt to flee the
congestion. When is the next election that they may run in? I
want to be sure to vote for their competition."
The Watch replies: The next Village election will take place
in April 2001, and already Firfer appears to be on the stump. While
members of her own party point out that no one has ever served more than
two terms as president, Firfer is holding neighborhood
"listening sessions" to discuss the issues with the voters.
She'll be at Huber Park at 7:30 p.m. August 2.
TRIMMING YOUR TREES BEFORE CHRISTMAS
CS asks how often the Village trims parkway trees?
"Someone told me recently that it is done every seven years, but to
me it has been longer than that. I have a silver maple in my front yard
that is in sad need of trimming, but I'm not going to shell out hundreds
of dollars to a landscaper if the village should be doing this for me. I
guess the Village is too interested in the Glen to care about the rest of
us. Sigh. . ."
The Watch replies: Chin-up, CS. The Village loves you too.
With an election coming in less than a year, you'll be getting lots
more attention. Just call public works (724-1700) and ask for an
inspection. Parkway trees are supposed to be trimmed every seven
years.
WILDLIFE WATCHING
Alexis Reynolds, a local naturalist, responds to our story about wildlife
in your backyard: "Skunks and other pesky animals can be
trapped in harmless "HAV-A-HART" traps. They come in a variety
of sizes for different animals, and skunks will not spray when they
are confined. Animals can then be released in the Forest Preserve. Try to
make sure that nesting season is over and check that females are not
nursing young by observing their bellies for swollen mammary glands. Read
all directions and use every precaution when dealing with wildlife."
The Watch replies: Thanks, Alexis. We're sure you know your stuff,
but when it comes to trapping and inspecting skunks, we'll call a
professional.
TOWNHOUSE RESIDENT OPPOSES OVERDEVELOPMENT
GN responds to builder Bernie Schmidt's claim that "communistic"
residents of townhomes don't mind high-density living: "I have lived
in a townhouse for almost four years, and I agree that the density of a
townhouse subdivision is higher than that of single family homes. As
an owner, I have made that choice, but those around the new townhouses do
not have the opportunity to make a similar choice. They bought their home
before the townhouses were built, and the density of the area changes
around them without their input. In addition, density can also lead
to basement flooding for the townhouse owner and for the single family
homeowner. Neither desires that outcome, and a push for more and more
development with more and more pavement will only lead to more of that for
all of us."
ENFORCING CONSTRUCTION RULES AT THE GLEN
A woman who lives near construction at the Glen says: "Village action
to close construction sites due to standing water is a day late and a
dollar short. My neighbors and I called the Village a number of
times to complain about the huge body of water directly behind our house.
It took weeks to get it drained. A walk around the Glen would reveal
many remaining bodies of standing water. This is leading to a huge
mosquito problem. We cannot sit outside and enjoy our patio once
twilight arrives. It is really a disappointment. Yes,
the building needs to continue, but if the current Glenview Manager can
not force developers to cooperate and follow the rules to protect current
citizens, then we need more responsive management."
THE RETURN OF AOPENER
These guys just won't quit. Aopener responds to last week's note
from Zcloser, who said he welcomes any builder who adheres to the zoning
laws currently on the books: "Is Zcloser aware that
current Glenview zoning laws allow a two-story house of up to 12,000
square feet on a half acre lot? Hello. . ."
YOUR TURN
What's on your mind? Drop us a line by e-mail at GlenviewWatch@aol.com
or the old-fashioned way.
We're at 3537 Maple Leaf Drive, Glenview, IL 60025. Thanks for reading.
Dean Schott and Sandy Hausman, Co-Editors of The Watch.
To read past issues of Glenview
Watch, Click Here
|