The Glenview Watch


February 23, 2004

Print

 

 

CONSULTANT RAISES QUESTIONS AND DOUBTS
 
While he was hired to answer questions about the future of downtown Glenview, consultant Robert Gibbs raised several doubts as he reviewed the findings in his 49-page report. The Detroit-based planner believes Glenview's downtown can support a 50 percent increase in retail space.
 
Because it would draw primarily from a 2.5 mile radius, Gibbs ruled out department and big box stores but said a specialty grocery store like Whole Foods, a drug store, bookstore, bakery, bagel shop, cafes and restaurants could do well.  He also thought Glenview could lure small clothing stores like Talbot's or Chico's and a shoe store.  "Believe it or not, you're greatly underserved for women's shoes in this market," he said.
            
"Almost all of your trade will be very, very local, so it won't increase traffic much," he contended, adding that the flow of traffic downtown is reasonable.
 
Gibbs, who worked on the original Oliver McMillan team at The Glen Town Center, also thought downtown could use a good camping and sporting goods store, "where you can come and buy your kayak or whatever." Other options included a gardening store, a 24-hour home office service center, such as Kinko's, plus more dental and medical offices.
          
He said 20-25 percent of the new businesses should be national chains with the power to attract customers on a regular basis.  Having heard that Glenview would host a grand opening for its new   train station last week, Gibbs expressed delight, saying the Metra stop is an important draw for downtown.
 
Editor's note: Gibbs out-of-town stripe was painfully wide when he confused the new Metra Station at The Glen with the downtown station, and we're still puzzled by his claim that Glenview has much in common with Cambridge, Massachusetts – Harvard University's home town. We were also surprised to hear that Glenview needs another place to purchase kayaks with Galyan's now open at The Glen, and we can't imagine that Chico's, with stores at Old Orchard and Northbrook, would be in any hurry to open in Glenview.  Gibbs also contradicted a traffic study mentioned in his own report – a recent analysis giving Glenview Road an "F" because it's so congested at certain times of day.  What's more, he told a publication called New Urban News, "Generally you need at least 25,000 cars a day going past your store unless you are in a major city like New York." Gibbs strongly encouraged Glenview to consider buildings with retail on the first floor and residential above, but in the Urban News interview he said, "It is very risky for the retailer to have residential above because you can't control how the resident maintains his unit.  It helps the commercial a little bit to have people above it, but 400-500 people living above a shopping district isn't going to make a lot of difference. You need people in the thousands."
 
Fortunately, the consultant was quick to say he is not making recommendations – only outlining options, and while he believes the town could support another 165,000 square feet of retail, he concedes that five or six key tenants requiring as little as  20,000 square feet could be enough to revive the neighborhood.  We hope the village board will keep that in mind when using public dollars to spark retail development on Glenview Road, recognizing that when the bill comes due, Mr. Gibbs will be back in Michigan, leaving local residents to pick up the tab.
 
THE FINANCIAL FLY IN THE OINTMENT
 
Gibbs said Glenview's demographics were "very favorable," with an average household income of $140,000, but he worried about the current economy.  Noting statewide unemployment of around 6.5 percent, the consultant said he was "a little concerned about this year.  If that starts to go up to the 8-9 percent range, then that could greatly influence our recommendations." Once unemployment gets that high, Gibbs explained, even people with steady jobs know someone who's unemployed, and that causes them to spend less.
 
WOODROW OFFERS A WORD OF EXPLANATION
 
Hoping to clear up confusion about the role of the report and a downtown redevelopment committee he will chair, Trustee Kimball Woodrow said the Gibbs' study assessed the amount and type of retail downtown could attract.  By contrast, his committee will have to figure out how the village can accommodate those businesses – what parking should be added, what changes to Glenview Road might be required, and what other services are needed.
 
Woodrow said he hopes to announce the committee members he's picked at the next village board meeting and said the group would also make sure that changes downtown were consistent with the comprehensive plan – a 10-year proposal for development to be publicly discussed for the first time Tuesday night when the plan commission holds a hearing.
 
PLAN COMMISSION TO HOLD FIRST HEARING ON GLENVIEW'S FUTURE
 
The comprehensive plan – a wish list created by a 20-member commission with the help of a Milwaukee-based consultant – is now available at www.glenview.il.us  or in the reference room of the public library.
 
In general, the plan calls for Glenview Road to become a pedestrian-friendly Main Street with three-story buildings housing stores on the first floor and apartments or offices above.  New structures would be placed close to the street, and parking would be located behind those buildings.  The Cloisters, built by Optima on the southeast corner of Glenview and Waukegan roads, is considered a prime example of this concept known as "new urban mixed use development."
 
The plan recommends keeping the library downtown in its current location or at a central site along Glenview Road.  The Gibbs report suggested that site might be the current location of the downtown fire station, and the comprehensive plan says the fire station could be moved to another downtown spot. In addition, the plan proposes offering economic incentives to developers who want to locate in downtown Glenview.  It specifically targets the shopping center across from Glenview's current library and the office building known as Colonial Court for redevelopment.
 
At 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, February 24 the plan commission will hold its first in a series of public hearings on the plan, including an overview and a discussion of ideas for downtown. Anyone who wishes to comment will be welcome in the board room at Village Hall. Proceedings will also be cablecast on channel 17. Subsequent hearings will focus on eight other parts of town including Jefferson, Monroe, Lehigh and Old Willow Road (March 9),  Milwaukee Avenue and Waukegan Road (March 30), West Lake and Greenwood (April 13). 
 
DOWNTOWN BUSINESS LEADERS LOST IN VILLAGE HALL SMOKE
 
Distraught by rumors of a grand new downtown that might not include them, local merchants met at the chamber of commerce building last week to decide what they should do.  Representatives from seven businesses fear the village will replace their buildings with new ones charging substantially higher rents than they can afford.
 
The merchants expressed doubts about Glenview's ability to support much new retail given vacant space at The Glen, and two Glenview Road businesses that now generate about $2 million in annual sales said they might not survive in a new location.
 
The business men and women vowed to take their questions and concerns to Village Hall on Tuesday night, but they seemed unclear about what they could achieve or who would be listening.  Some thought they would be addressing the trustees, while others thought they would be talking with members of the Comprehensive Plan Commission.  They had no clue why Glenview's plan commission was involved and had never heard of Trustee Kimball Woodrow, a major player in plans to redevelop Glenview Road. 
 
Chamber of Commerce President Paul Jones, president of Glenview State Bank, did not attend the downtown merchants' meeting.
 
Editor's note: The plan commission has no direct control over the future of downtown Glenview and no obligation to the voters.  As an appointed panel, it holds public hearings, discusses possible developments and advises the village board, but on many occasions the trustees have chosen to disregard plan commission advice.
 
TRUSTEES PLAN NEW COP SHOP
 
The village board continued to debate the look of a new police station to be built at the corner of Lake Avenue and Shermer Road.  Architect John Bosman showed the trustees pictures of other police stations and public buildings, hoping to get feedback that might guide his team to draw something to Glenview's liking.  Earlier drawings were flatly rejected by the board.
 
In looking at new photos, however, the trustees couldn't give much informed architectural advice.  President Larry Carlson said he liked one facility because it looked "like a police station. Those vertical elements look like bars," he explained.
 
The architect was surprised by that observation, and Trustee Jeff Lerner promptly informed Carlson that "most modern jails don't have bars."
 
"They don't have bars?" said Carlson. "How do they keep `em in?"
 
"With locked doors," said Lerner.
 
"I must be watching too many Humphrey Bogart movies," concluded Carlson.
 
Lerner said he was fond of another building "because it had a clock," and Trustee Jim Patterson favored a structure with globe lights. "That makes it look like Gotham City," he explained.
 
Trustee Kerry Cummings panned two buildings saying one looked too much like Glenview's award winning Park Center and the other resembled Northbrook's village hall, but when architect Carol Sente concluded the board wanted something "unique," Cummings disagreed, saying she liked the look of the new Metra station at The Glen."
 
"I don't know if ‘unique' is the right word," said Trustee Lerner.  "The way I would phrase it is we don't want it to look like another building that already exists.  ‘Unique' takes on the connotation of  ‘distinctly different.'  I don't want it to be distinctly different, but I don't want it to look like the Park Center either."
 
"When I hear ‘unique,' I don't hear ‘traditional,'" said Patterson. 
 
From other remarks, architect Sente concluded the board preferred a traditional building with a pitched roof and red brick, but when she mentioned adding some elements of contemporary styling, Patterson objected.  "I think the consensus is to stay more traditional." Cummings, Lerner  and Carlson agreed.
 
Editor's note: We doubt these trustees were elected for their expertise in architecture.  In fact, with the exception of Woodrow we don't think any of them know much about design.  An enlightened board would send the architects to meet with our appearance commission, a panel of architects and designers, allowing them to choose several options.  Then, the trustees could pick the building that would cost least and be most energy efficient or – all things being equal – submit the various designs for a public vote.
 
RUSSIAN MERCHANT LEFT OUT IN THE COLD
 
When attorney Julius Cole appeared before the trustees to request a liquor license for his client, Tatiana Tomshevskaya, he described an "upscale liquor store," to be located at 9800 N. Milwaukee Avenue.  He said Fine Liquors would offer some everyday lines of beer and wine, but 90 percent of the merchandise would be imported vodka, cognac, wines and cigars. Cole predicted the store would attract customers from all over the North Shore.
 
Trustee Lerner read the application and noted that no date was listed for incorporation of Fine Liquors, Inc.  He also observed that the lease for retail space was still being negotiated.  Cole said he was not sure whether corporate papers had come through yet, but Assistant Village Manager Joe Wade said a liquor license would not be issued until those papers and a signed lease were submitted. 
 
Lerner then wondered why the address of the applicant had been blacked out on the application.  Wade said that was routinely done on materials being made public to protect the privacy of the applicant.
 
Recognizing that the applicant would have to complete a number of state requirements before getting the license, including a police background check, Trustee Woodrow moved for approval.  In previous votes on matters involving the sale of alcohol, Trustee Mary Beth Denefe had also been willing to lend support, but she was absent, and no other member of the board was willing to offer a second.
 
The startled attorney wondered what he could do to get this matter on the next agenda.
 
"The issue of reconsideration is subject to the president placing it on the agenda or a trustee asking to have it reconsidered," said Village Manager Paul McCarthy.
 
"If there is not a second, I would consider that insufficient interest," Carlson concluded.
 
Moments later, after a jovial exchange about what a fine shopping center Town Center is, a U.S.-born applicant received his license to serve more than 100 kinds of beer until 1 a.m. at The Glen.

Editor's note: This is the second time Glenview's village board has snubbed a Russian-born businesswoman.  The first time, a woman hoping to open a daycare center on Waukegan Road was turned away because the trustees did not feel Waukegan Road was a wholesome location for children. The vote was eventually reversed when the would-be day care operator hired an environmental attorney to plead her case.  Last year also saw a Korean-American businessman turned down on plans to open an upscale liquor store on Glenview Road near Wilmette. Isn't it time for Glenview's Korean-American community and its Russian residents to get involved in local politics, to elect representatives who will respond to the issues that impact their businesses, places of worship and families?
 
MENDING FENCES AT WAGNER FARM?
 
While leaders of Citizens Organized for Wagners remain bitter about the way they were shut out of park district plans for the farm they worked to save, the district is moving to avoid one of the greatest areas of controversy – culling or sending animals to slaughter. Last week, the park board voted to lease new animals for its educational programs.  A lactating cow and calf, three pigs and three sheep will be coming to Glenview on a temporary basis.  When they've fulfilled their mission – to teach area residents about agricultural practices in the 1920's – they'll be returned to their home farms.  In a memo to the park board, members of the district's museum committee concluded, "This plan would allow the district to get through the next two years without having to de-accession a cow."
 
The board is taking a different approach to horses – buying a 10-year-old pair of Percherons – a sturdy breed used to pull farm equipment in olden days. 
 
COWS CONDEMNS LOCAL PAPER
 
Citizens Organized for Wagners has objected to the plan for pigs, sheep and horses at Wagner Farm, arguing that the Wagners kept only cows and chickens.  Members say the district is turning an historic site into a petting zoo.
 
The park board says it's attempting to represent the history of agriculture in this region, rather than remaining faithful to the history of Wagner Farm in particular. 
 
COWS is also furious with the Glenview Announcements, a publication which editorialized against acquisition of the farm and now supports the park district's decision to diversify.  When COWS' President Mark Steger wrote a letter to the editor explaining his group's views, it was held for a week, heavily edited and printed – not as a letter but as a guest essay.
 
The paper deleted a paragraph in which Steger attacked the park board for "enlisting the services  of 70 taxpayers for nine months and spending $80,000 on consultants to create a master plan [for the farm]."  Steger said that plan, which argued for keeping only cows and chickens, was "discarded at the whim of the park district."
 
The Announcements also left out Steger's assertion that the park district was pleased to faithfully preserve the home of The Kennicotts – "an aristocratic family" at The Grove, but was unwilling to recognize "a common family like the Wagners."
 
During their final years in Glenview, Pete and Rose Wagner had no fondness for Glenview's park district, and Rose, knowing the park district wanted her property, willed it to her church, instructing that it be sold to the highest bidder. 
 
Editor's note: The Glenview Journal says it will run Steger's letter in its entirety.
 
MORE PARK DISTRICT PATTER
 
– For $5 per adult, grandparents can bring grandchildren to Splash Landings for a swim on March 6 or April 24.  The kids will get in free.  Special grandparent days are set for the outdoor pools on June 26 and July 24.
 
– The Health and Fitness Center is offering a special deal for new members in April – 60 days for $60 will allow residents to try the facilities before committing to a full-year membership.
 
– In conjunction with Evanston Northwestern Health, Park Center will sponsor an adolescent weight management program beginning with a lecture in May. 
 
– The Third Annual triathalon will take place Sunday, August 1 with a kids' fun run set for July 31 at Park Center.
 
ENH FACES FEDERAL COMPLAINT
 
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare faces a hearing before the Federal Trade Commission over claims it fixed prices and raised rates, charging far more at Highland Park Hospital than was being charged at other area medical centers.   ENH owns Glenbrook, Evanston and Northwestern Hospitals.  It acquired Highland Park Hospital in 2000.  If the FTC rules against ENH, the corporation would have to sell Highland Park Hospital.
 
NEWS FROM THE NEIGHBORS
 
– Glencoe could be the first suburb on the North Shore to offer a voluntary review of new homes by its appearance commission.  In exchange for submitting plans, builders would be allowed to construct slightly larger homes. The process would involve design guidelines used to evaluate proposed houses in the context of their neighbors.  The idea came in response to the large number of teardowns taking place in the small lakefront community.  Last year, 53 homes were razed.
 
– Members of the Northbrook Rotary gave more than food and money to help Northfield Township's Food Pantry this month.  They knocked down a wall at the pantry's headquarters, built and installed shelves, providing an additional 350 square feet the facility needed for storage. Rotary International matched the local club's $500 contribution, and Home Depot donated $1,000 worth of lumber and other supplies for the project.
 
– School District 225 has voted to charge $75 for the behind-the-wheel portion of driver's education at Glenbrook South and North, up from the current charge of $50. The board also voted to raise bus pass charged by $30-$50 depending on the distance a student travels while hiking parking charges by $15 a year.
 
– Northbrook's village president is pushing the plan commission to make a quick decision for an office building at 1363 Shermer Road.  The panel had originally said it would hold its next hearing for that development in May.  "February to May?" said Mark Damisch.  "No. Uh, uh. No."
Chicago developer Mitch Gerson wants to build 36,000 square feet, but the plan commission wants him to provide more parking.
 
– Fans of bicycle racing have raised $225,000 to rehabilitate the velodrome owned by Northbrook's park district.  "We're way over the top of where we expected to be," the committee's top  fundraiser told the Northbrook Star. "We came up with a lot more money than anybody ever dreamed we would."  In the history of Northbrook's park district,  Executive Director Ed Harvey said volunteers have never raised such a large amount in so short a time.
 
– The Chicagoland Jewish High School has purchased seven acres of land on the south side of Lake-Cook Road just west of Pfingsten.  The school is currently operating in Morton Grove but hopes to build in Deerfield.
 
TWO CORRECTIONS
 
The owner of the Cubby Bear, who was planning to open a restaurant in Glenview, is George Loukas, not George Baker, and it is the Detroit Lions' central office that has LEED certification rather than the Lions Clubs of Detroit.
 
READERS WRITE
 
BL was surprised at how little she learned from a consultant's report on downtown: "So how much did our village spend for this 49-page consultant's report? I was part of a focus group at a local market research firm several years ago (while Nancy Firfer was still in office), discussing what residents would like to see in downtown Glenview. Guess what? The consensus of our group was we needed a high-quality grocery store downtown, like Sunset Food or the popular grocery at the time, Fresh Farms, a nice restaurant, preferably near the Waukegan-Glenview Road intersection, a Starbuck's and specialty shops. We thought the buildings looked like heck with different awnings, facades and signs. Some of us commented how beautiful and popular the downtown renovation was in Highland Park and hoped we'd get something like that. This is not rocket science. There is nothing new or revolutionary in this consultant's report. In order to increase business downtown, you need to attract customers with name boutique stores, like Banana Republic. You want to attract teens  with specialty stores geared to them. Teens are a major segment of the buying public, but there is nothing for them to do or buy in our current downtown. Increased foot traffic means more money spent."
 
JAS was puzzled by our report that a downtown consultant proposes locating a new library on the downtown fire station's site: "What's with the library, or anything else, being located where the Glenview Fire Station is?  Now that we are building a big new station in east Glenview (to cover Wilmette?) and another one at The Glen, we're being told the downtown station is going to disappear?  Where is the coverage for the downtown that we are going to revitalize (with a movie theater no less) and for all the homes in central Glenview that have been dependent on that station for many years?  The handwriting has been on the wall for a long time but like everything else, the village has kept it secret from the public until it's too late."
 
Mr. H doubts some of the merchants listed by consultant Gibbs would actually be interested in downtown Glenview: "Brooks Brothers, Marshall's and Talbot's are high volume stores, and regardless of the expected increase in our population there wouldn't be enough traffic to support them. The only thing making any sense was the recommendation to keep the library downtown."
 
And a reader calling himself the Common Sense Consultant wrote about the suggestion that Glenview use tax increment financing to encourage downtown development: "Another TIF? Cookie-cutter condo/retail canyons? (If it's Tuesday, I must be in Glenview?). My advice to the trustees regarding Mr. Gibbs' downtown report: Take it to the trash. It's time to end restrictions on ground floor businesses, offer incentives for the kinds of commerce we need, add angled parking, rent empty spaces and prosper again."
 
George P. Nassos, Director of the Center for Sustainable Enterprise at IIT, responds to news Glenview's new police station could be certified by the U.S. Green Building Council for leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED): "I am a real supporter of LEED buildings having visited several in the United States.  In California and some other regions, all new government buildings are required to be LEED certified. To show that Glenview is a progressive village, we should incorporate energy and environmental designs in all Glenview buildings. The cost of a LEED building doesn't necessarily have to exceed a non-LEED building.  If it does, the premium is so small that payback can be one to two years."
 
Bob Sherman has been reading readers' comments about the use of salt on local roads: "According to an article in Popular Mechanics, road salt can be made non-corrosive by the addition of two parts per hundred of sodium dichromate.  I wonder if our village is using this improved type of salt."
 
Village spokesman Janet Spector Bishop replies: "Public Works is familiar with a variety
of salt substitutes and their associated costs and benefits. Conventional public works research to which it subscribes does not detail sodium dichromate.  Public Works pre-wets sodium chloride (aka road salt) with calcium chloride to make it more effective, thus reducing the amount of salt needed for de-icing operations.  Staff is aware of other options, such as calcium magnesium acetate, magnesium chloride, and potassium chloride that are used in some U.S. communities but feels that Glenview uses the best solution when all factors are considered: safety of roads, environmental impact and cost. The three alternatives mentioned above cost $250-$300 a ton as opposed to road salt at $30 per ton."
 
DK is looking for a group to oppose the park district's referendum: "Do you know if there is a ‘No for Pools' group?  I am a new home owner in The Glen and feel that we already pay enough property taxes in Glenview.  I also think that the people using the pool should be paying more for the new pool, not homeowners who don't use it."
 
The Watch replies: We do not know of any organized opposition to a tax hike for new outdoor swimming pools.
 
Rick Nasello is surprised by the scope of park district plans for pools: "After receiving my Glenview Park District magazine the other day I immediately went to the section covering the replacement of the pools at Flick and Roosevelt parks. Why does Flick Park need five swimming pools? Wouldn't one large pool for the masses and a smaller pool for the toddlers be sufficient? It seems like the park district is trying to cater to individual groups ( lap/activity pool, zero depth activity pool, kiddie pool, deep water tank, water slide pool) at the cost of every taxpayer. This is serious overkill. How many pools are at Flick Park now? Seems like the only complaint is it's poor condition. The park district goes on to say, ‘The total cost to build both pools is expected to be $15,875,000.'  I counted seven pools to be constructed. That's right – seven. Five at Flick and two at Roosevelt. The park district is not rebuilding both pools. They're building a water park. Will it be in competition with Splash Landings at Park Center during the summer months? Now when the village is done shaking us down for the swimming pools, everybody get ready for round two when they start planning a new downtown. Only about 2,500 people came out to vote in the last village election, and this is what they let the people in charge of the village get away with. Pass me the Kleenex."
 
Park planners offer this explanation for the aquatic centers they have in mind: "The current Flick Pool has three separate tanks.  The new design calls for five. We added one to comply with a state requirement that the entry pool from slides be segregated from other areas.  Creating a separate tank can also minimize conflicting uses between pool goers.  (Lap swimmers and water slide users do not mix well). The introduction of a zero depth pool at Flick is in response to community interest and reflects the standard in aquatics today. Rick Nasello is correct in suggesting that the district is attempting to meet the needs of the community by offering a varied swim experience. The new designs offer opportunities for parents and toddlers, school aged children, tweens and teens, adults, fitness minded individuals and families in general.  These decisions were based on the information received from the public over the past year through seven public workshops, over 700 written evaluations, numerous park board meetings, and a number of mailings to every household.  The pools are not designed to be water parks with a regional draw. They reflect the standard in aquatic design today and are very similar to the pools found in surrounding communities.  The two current pools are designed to accommodate 1,400 people each.  The new designs will have virtually the same capacity.  Our outdoor and indoor swim programs are complimentary, not in competition with each other.  This would not change with new facilities. Whatever concerns Nasello may have with plans for downtown revitalization really have no bearing on the question of whether or not the community would like to have outdoor pools for its children.  They are two separate issues and should be considered independently, based on their individual merits."
 
RG is puzzled by next year's allocation for the new village manager's wheels: "I must be somewhat naive, so maybe you can set me straight.  I recently read in the Watch that $45,000 had been budgeted for an automobile for the new village manager.  The thinking apparently is that he or she will need transportation to attend meetings and generally perform any outside duties required by the position. With that kind of a money, we are probably looking at a gas guzzling SUV.  I guess that this makes sense in view of all of the mountainous areas and unpaved roads in our community. Why else would we consider spending so much when a $17,000 compact car with great gas mileage would suffice? Perhaps our glorious leaders should start thinking about the dollars they are spending as if they were their own money."
 
And CC does not share Village President Carlson's dismay over a new zip code for Glenview: "Larry Carlson whines and wants Glenview citizenry to rally behind his protest against a second zip code required by the U.S. Postal Service for more efficient processing of mail. This change will, of course, impact Carlson's home and business. This is the same Larry Carlson who has blindly endorsed change in other parts of town, then airily dismissed legions of concerned citizens who sought relief from problems that changes caused them. As an east side resident, I have one thing to say: ‘Change happens, Larry.'"
 


YOUR TURNWrite to glenviewwatch@aol.com or 3537 Maple Leaf Drive, Glenview, IL 60026. If you haven’t already done so, please consider making a contribution to support The Watch. Non-deductible checks should be payable to Glenview Watch. Thanks for your support and for reading. Dean Schott and Sandy Hausman, Co-Editors.


To read past issues of Glenview Watch, Click Here